Science of Money

Four words most people use interchangeably

Income is money that arrives regularly — a salary, rent collected, business profit. It is a flow. Assets are things you own with value: a house, savings, shares. Not every asset pays you; only some of them, like a let property, produce income.

Liabilities are what you owe — a card, a loan, a mortgage. Wealth is assets minus liabilities, and that is the whole definition.

The worked example in the deck is the point. A three-thousand-a-month rental income against 550,000 of property and shares and a 100,000 mortgage is a position of 450,000. A six-thousand-a-month salary against a 200,000 house and 10,000 saved is 210,000. The bigger income is the smaller position, and no amount of looking at the payslip would show it.

The science part — five things you can check on paper

Rule of 72. Years to double equals 72 divided by the annual return. Six per cent doubles in twelve years, nine in eight, twelve in six. It is worth memorising mostly as an arithmetic check on anybody promising you fast.

Fifty, thirty, twenty: needs, wants, savings. Six months of expenses held liquid before anything more interesting. Three or more sources of income rather than one.

And the shape of all of it: time times rate times consistency. Three factors multiplied, so removing any one of them takes the result to nothing — which is why a high return held for a year beats nothing, and a modest return held for twenty beats almost everything.

The art part, and why it comes second

Buying what is cheap and selling where it is scarce. Charging for what you know rather than only for what you do. Renting out what you already own. Introducing two people who needed each other. Being early to something.

None of that is arithmetic and none of it can be taught as a formula, which is exactly why it comes after the science and not instead of it.

Skip the science and the art is gambling with better vocabulary. Skip the art and you will do everything correctly and never once get the windfall.

Seven stages, and the shortcut that does not hold

Sell your labour. Then sell a skill rather than hours. Then cut the cost of living enough to save. Then use the savings to buy assets. Then make those assets generate income. Then turn the income into systems and businesses. Then scale.

The stages are in that order for a reason, and skipping one is the deck's definition of a shortcut that does not survive contact with anything.

Beside it, five sentences to treat as a red flag rather than a pitch: you can get rich, anyone can do it, it happens quickly, it needs no time, it needs no brain. Any one of them is a reason to look harder, not to sign.

The two pieces of homework

Make a ledger. Your own income, your own assets, your own liabilities. Then set financial goals against it and say what you will actually do to grow the position.

And separately: write down every way you have ever made money, whatever the amount. Mark the ones you earned from more than twice. Then arrive at one figure — the total money you have made in your life so far.

That second one is uncomfortable and it is the more useful of the two, because most people have never written it down and cannot say it to within an order of magnitude.

Your note

Saved on this device as you type.